
In 1984, the United States Congress and President Ronald Reagan passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. Reagan was originally planning to veto the act because of his concerns about infringing on the state's rights to govern their own alcohol laws but he later changed his stance.

In South Dakota vs. Dole, the state argued that the law violated the state's right to govern itself in the 10th Amendment, the Taxing and Spending Clause, and the 21st Amendment of the Constitution. The 21st Amendment lifted prohibition and regulates how state and federal governments govern alcohol laws, with the responsibility resting mainly on the state. Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth Dole was the defendant in the case because her office was responsible for enforcing the legislation. The Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, ruled that Congress had engaged in a valid exercise of its power under the Taxing and Spending Clause, and did not violate the 21st Amendment. He also stated that the Tenth Amendment bars federal regulation of the States, and it has been suggested that the Twenty-First Amendment might prohibit federal regulation of the drinking age. The Supreme Court pointed out that the Congressional condition of highway funds was merely to pressure the State to comply, not a requirement to do so, because the State's failure to meet the condition deprives it of only 5% of the highway funds it may obtain.
Since its passing in 1984, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act saves an estimated 900 lives a
